[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: anonymous binds

To: mcs@netscape.com (Mark C Smith)
Subject: Re: anonymous binds
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 14:13:10 -0800
Cc: Jim Sermersheim <JIMSE@novell.com>, Richard Ellis <RELLIS@novell.com>, ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <3A12F5ED.2050608@netscape.com>
References: <sa1193fc.006@prv-mail20.provo.novell.com>

At 03:45 PM 11/15/00 -0500, Mark C Smith wrote:
>I am not convinced that there is any real difference between an "unauthenticated bind" and an "anonymous bind."  Certainly in terms of access control and so on, they are likely equivalent.
>
>Can someone provide a useful definition?

You did in your previous message.  You stated that it was a long
standing practice to allow the client to specify a DN which would
be unauthenticated and only provide anonymous access.  This DN
would b

References:
- Re: anonymous binds
  - From: "Jim Sermersheim" <JIMSE@novell.com>
- Re: anonymous binds
  - From: mcs@netscape.com (Mark C Smith)

Prev by Date: Re: Please review: LDAPv3 Data Model Definitions
Next by Date: Re: anonymous binds
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread