[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Ignoring tagged elements in RFC 2251



> Basically I've moved "tags" to "tagged" before elements (only to clarify), and > changed SEQUENCE to PDU (because I think it really means any SEQUENCE, SET, or
> CHOICE).
  
> Does anyone see a problem with this?

Yes.

1. LDAP has no SET, only SET OF.

2. I don't think you mean to ignore a unrecognized tag in a CHOICE.

That is why I said SEQUENCE.

Mark Wahl
Sun Microsystems Inc.