[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: RFC 2255bis



I shouldn't have couched my argument in the use of referrals. It's not, in fact why I stumbled onto the need. We'd like to represent a full search query in an attribute. One specific application of doing this is to specify the query for a dynamic group object (see iPlanet's implementation of groupOfURLs). We have (like iPlanet) chosen to represent the query as an LDAP URL. At first glance, this seems adequately suited for such a job. It seems likely that at some point we'll need to express size/time limits. It seems even more likely that we'll need to express alias dereferencing behavior.
 
If the LDAP URL is not extended to include all parts of an LDAP search operation, I propose that the RFC states why certain parts are allowed and why other parts are ignored. Currently, the abstract states "The format describes an LDAP search operation to perform to retrieve information from an LDAP directory.". This statement is false because only a subset of the LDAP search operation can be specified. It should state that the URL format allows a simplified LDAP search to be specified.
 
Jim


>>> "David Chadwick" <d.w.chadwick@salford.ac.uk> 10/28/00 9:38:03 AM >>>
From:               "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

>
> However, the question for LDAPbis to answer is not:
>   what changes to LDAPv3 would be generally useful?
> but:
>   what changes are required to progress the LDAPv3 to Draft Standard?
>

I dont think things like size limits and time limits should be returned
in referrals for two reasons:
i) was given by Kurt above, the other is
ii) a client actually sets these values the first time around and is
therefore capable of setting them again on subsequent requests.
The only reason a server could have for returning these values, is
that the server wants to inform the client about some internal limits
(for example admin limits) that may differ from the client specified
ones. But given this is a referral to another server, how is the
referring server to know what these are? I therefore do not see a
case for adding parameters such as size and time limits to referrals.

David

> Kurt
>
>


***************************************************

David Chadwick
IS Institute, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT
Tel +44 161 295 5351  Fax +44 161 745 8169
Mobile +44 790 167 0359
Email D.W.Chadwick@salford.ac.uk
Home Page  http://www.salford.ac.uk/its024/chadwick.htm
Understanding X.500  http://www.salford.ac.uk/its024/X500.htm
X.500/LDAP Seminars http://www.salford.ac.uk/its024/seminars.htm
Entrust key validation string MLJ9-DU5T-HV8J

***************************************************