Full_Name: Hugo van der Kooij Version: 2.0 gamma OS: Linux 2.2 URL: http://www.linuxworld.com/linuxworld/lw-1999-09/lw-09-ldap-netscape.html Submission from: (NULL) (62.45.9.24) Adding the netscape roaming access does not work with openldap 2.0 gamma but it works with openldap 1.2.11 It seems the schema is not imported properly as the errors seem to indicate that the nsLIProfile class is not working well. No further info is available at tthis moment. Hugo.
The original message was received at Fri, 25 Aug 2000 22:39:47 GMT from jitterbug@localhost.openldap.org [127.0.0.1] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <hugo@vanderkooij.org> (reason: 550 Mail from 204.152.186.51 refused; see http://www.orbs.org/) ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to hvdkooij.dynip.nl.: >>> MAIL From:<openldap-its@OpenLDAP.org> <<< 550 Mail from 204.152.186.51 refused; see http://www.orbs.org/ 554 5.0.0 <hugo@vanderkooij.org>... Service unavailable
*** THIS IS AN AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED REPLY *** Thanks for your report to openldap-its@OpenLDAP.org. Your report has been placed into our Issue Tracking System and has been assigned the tracking number ITS#687. One of support engineers will look at your report in due course. Note that this may take some time because our support engineers are volunteers. They only work on OpenLDAP when they have spare time. You may follow the progress of this message by loading the following URL in a web browser: http://www.OpenLDAP.org/its/index.cgi?findid=687 Please remember to retain your issue tracking number (ITS#687) on any further messages you send to us regarding this message. If you don't then you'll just waste our time and yours because we won't be able to properly track the message. In our experience many people ask questions that have been asked before. We recommend that you review our online FAQ http://www.OpenLDAP.org/faq/ and search archives of our many mailing lists (such as openldap-software and openldap-bugs). http://www.OpenLDAP.org/lists/#archives -------------- Copyright 1999 The OpenLDAP Foundation, All Rights Reserved.
At 10:39 PM 8/25/00 +0000, hugo@vanderkooij.org wrote: >Full_Name: Hugo van der Kooij >Version: 2.0 gamma >OS: Linux 2.2 >URL: http://www.linuxworld.com/linuxworld/lw-1999-09/lw-09-ldap-netscape.html >Submission from: (NULL) (62.45.9.24) > > >Adding the netscape roaming access does not work with openldap 2.0 gamma but it >works with openldap 1.2.11 > >It seems the schema is not imported properly as the errors seem to indicate that >the nsLIProfile class is not working well. OpenLDAP 2.x schema directives (attributeType and objectClass) are significantly different than their 1.x counterparts to handle LDAPv3 requirements. 1.x schema files will no load under 2.x and must be updated. Kurt
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote: > At 10:39 PM 8/25/00 +0000, hugo@vanderkooij.org wrote: > >Full_Name: Hugo van der Kooij > >Version: 2.0 gamma > >OS: Linux 2.2 > >URL: http://www.linuxworld.com/linuxworld/lw-1999-09/lw-09-ldap-netscape.html > >Submission from: (NULL) (62.45.9.24) > > > > > >Adding the netscape roaming access does not work with openldap 2.0 gamma but it > >works with openldap 1.2.11 > > > >It seems the schema is not imported properly as the errors seem to indicate that > >the nsLIProfile class is not working well. > > OpenLDAP 2.x schema directives (attributeType and objectClass) are > significantly different than their 1.x counterparts to handle > LDAPv3 requirements. 1.x schema files will no load under 2.x and > must be updated. Is there a conversion tool I overlooked? Hugo. -- Hugo van der Kooij; Oranje Nassaustraat 16; 3155 VJ Maasland hvdkooij@caiw.nl http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~hvdkooij/ -------------------------------------------------------------- Quoting this tagline is illegal! (http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html)
changed notes changed state Open to Closed
At 06:48 AM 8/26/00 +0000, Hugo.van.der.Kooij@caiw.nl wrote: >Is there a conversion tool I overlooked? No. Kurt
On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote: > At 06:48 AM 8/26/00 +0000, Hugo.van.der.Kooij@caiw.nl wrote: > >Is there a conversion tool I overlooked? > > No. Is there some documentation that will help me convert it manualy? Like descriptions of both formats Hugo. -- Hugo van der Kooij; Oranje Nassaustraat 16; 3155 VJ Maasland hvdkooij@caiw.nl http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~hvdkooij/ -------------------------------------------------------------- Quoting this tagline is illegal! (http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html)
On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote: > At 06:48 AM 8/26/00 +0000, Hugo.van.der.Kooij@caiw.nl wrote: > >Is there a conversion tool I overlooked? > > No. Included a translation I did from 1.x to 2.x format. The original 1.x lines are marked with #ORG# Please comment on it if you feel I made any mistakes. I won't be able to test today. Perhaps on monday afternoon. I used chapter 8 from the new OpenLDAP Administrators Guide. Once the file is correct and verified I would like to donate it to the OpenLDAP project. I may also write some documentation regarding it's use with netscape if you think it would be helpfull. Regards, Hugo. PS: Cc to Kartik Subbarao as he was the author of the LinuxWorld article that got me started. PS/2: I prefer to write documentation in DocBook SGML (v3.1) but I guess that shouldn't be a problem with the OpenLDAP crew. -- Hugo van der Kooij; Oranje Nassaustraat 16; 3155 VJ Maasland hvdkooij@caiw.nl http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~hvdkooij/ -------------------------------------------------------------- Quoting this tagline is illegal! (http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html)
At 02:21 PM 8/27/00 +0200, Hugo.van.der.Kooij@caiw.nl wrote: >Included a translation I did from 1.x to 2.x format. The original 1.x >lines are marked with #ORG# It's best for the schema originator, Netscape in this case, to provide the LDAPv3 compliant (RFC 2252) schema definitions. From server vendors, one should be able to read such from subschema subentries published by their product (with their schema loaded). The mapping between LDAPv2 and LDAPv3 schema definitions is not direct (otherwise we would have provided software to do the mapping). >Please comment on it if you feel I made any mistakes. I won't be able to >test today. Out of scope of this ITS (which has been closed). You have mistakes, you will have questions, please take them to the software mailing list. >Once the file is correct and verified I would like to donate it to the >OpenLDAP project. We, of course, welcome such contributions... >I may also write some documentation regarding it's use >with netscape if you think it would be helpfull. We'd welcome this as well. >PS/2: I prefer to write documentation in DocBook SGML (v3.1) but I guess >that shouldn't be a problem with the OpenLDAP crew. We ask that documentation be submitted in Simple Document Format. I guess that this shouldn't be a problem for you.
User needs to provide proper schema