Issue 182 - Added Date Filter, Priority Filter, and Filter Reset
Summary: Added Date Filter, Priority Filter, and Filter Reset
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: OpenLDAP
Classification: Unclassified
Component: slapd (show other issues)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All All
: --- normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: OpenLDAP project
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 1999-05-27 15:32 UTC by Richard Pike
Modified: 2014-08-01 21:06 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Richard Pike 1999-05-27 15:32:36 UTC
I am presently polishing up my changes to Jitterbug 1.6.2 which I hope to
have uploaded soon.

1. Added age filter to select messages older or newer than the specified
number of days and tidied up 
    filter pane including addition of a "reset filter" button.The date
filter works well along with the priority 
    filter to get all high or urgent priority messages older than n days.

2. Enhanced Darren Gonzales' Priority Feature:
   a. Generalized to use a character array to set priority list. Setting
the default setting is still awkward. 
       It should be an easy modification to read this list from a
"priorities" file like users, if someone has a 
       good idea how to specify which item is the default.
   b. Added Priority checkbox filter and cleaned up match_message logic
slightly.

3. Finishing up a "taken by" feature (as opposed to the usual
"assigned_to") so that a registered user can 
    claim an issue if no one else has already claimed it and unclaim it
when complete or so someone else 
    can work on it.  Others users can see who, if anybody, has claimed an
issue.  There is also a filter option
    for this. Anybody have a better name than "taken by"?


For the priority feature, I used a looping technique to dynamically create
and process cgi variables which could 
be used as a model for the addition of any variable length list item (such
as STATUS).

For the priority checkboxes, I used a power of 2 bitmask to carry the state
of the checkbox to avoid adding too 
many variables. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Richard Pike                               Email: rpike@labs.gte.com
GTE Laboratories Incorporated      Phone: 781-466-2689
40 Sylvan Road, MS 61                Fax:     781-466-2712
Waltham, MA 02451-1128
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Comment 1 Kurt Zeilenga 1999-05-27 15:58:47 UTC
OpenLDAP is not the maintainer of Jitterbug.  Please use
	http://jitterbug.samba.org/cgi-bin/jitterbug

To submit such.


At 03:34 PM 5/27/99 GMT, rpike@labs.gte.com wrote:
>
>I am presently polishing up my changes to Jitterbug 1.6.2 which I hope to
>have uploaded soon.
>
>1. Added age filter to select messages older or newer than the specified
>number of days and tidied up 
>    filter pane including addition of a "reset filter" button.The date
>filter works well along with the priority 
>    filter to get all high or urgent priority messages older than n days.
>
>2. Enhanced Darren Gonzales' Priority Feature:
>   a. Generalized to use a character array to set priority list. Setting
>the default setting is still awkward. 
>       It should be an easy modification to read this list from a
>"priorities" file like users, if someone has a 
>       good idea how to specify which item is the default.
>   b. Added Priority checkbox filter and cleaned up match_message logic
>slightly.
>
>3. Finishing up a "taken by" feature (as opposed to the usual
>"assigned_to") so that a registered user can 
>    claim an issue if no one else has already claimed it and unclaim it
>when complete or so someone else 
>    can work on it.  Others users can see who, if anybody, has claimed an
>issue.  There is also a filter option
>    for this. Anybody have a better name than "taken by"?
>
>
>For the priority feature, I used a looping technique to dynamically create
>and process cgi variables which could 
>be used as a model for the addition of any variable length list item (such
>as STATUS).
>
>For the priority checkboxes, I used a power of 2 bitmask to carry the state
>of the checkbox to avoid adding too 
>many variables. 
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-------------
>Richard Pike                               Email: rpike@labs.gte.com
>GTE Laboratories Incorporated      Phone: 781-466-2689
>40 Sylvan Road, MS 61                Fax:     781-466-2712
>Waltham, MA 02451-1128
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-------------
>
>
>
Comment 2 Kurt Zeilenga 1999-05-27 16:03:55 UTC
changed notes
changed state Open to Closed
Comment 3 OpenLDAP project 2014-08-01 21:06:08 UTC
Not OpenLDAP