Viewing Web/4993
Full headers

Major security issue: yes  no

Notes:
Need specific changes
Notification:

Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 22:02:52 GMT
From: bevan@fulcrummicro.com
To: openldap-its@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Roadmap very out of date

Full_Name: Bevan Bennett
Version: NA
OS: NA
URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/
Submission from: (NULL) (66.59.247.209)


The roadmap at http://www.openldap.org/software/roadmap.html has not been
updated since January of 2006, and lists version 2.4 as being expected in "Q1 of
2006". Since we're now nearly done with Q2 of 2007, this is clearly not the
case.

Someone should pop in and update the roadmap to reflect the last 16 months of
progress or lack thereof.

Reply 1

From: Gavin Henry <openldap-its@OpenLDAP.org>
To: openldap-its@openldap.org
Subject: Re: Roadmap very out of date (ITS#4993)
Date: Sun Jul 15 18:50:17 2007

> Full_Name: Bevan Bennett
> Version: NA
> OS: NA
> URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/
> Submission from: (NULL) (66.59.247.209)
> 
> 
> The roadmap at http://www.openldap.org/software/roadmap.html has not been
> updated since January of 2006, and lists version 2.4 as being expected in
"Q1
of
> 2006". Since we're now nearly done with Q2 of 2007, this is clearly not
the
> case.
> 
> Someone should pop in and update the roadmap to reflect the last 16 months
of
> progress or lack thereof.
> 
> 

Anyone had change to look at our road map yet?

Gavin.

Reply 2

From: Gavin Henry <openldap-its@OpenLDAP.org>
To: openldap-its@openldap.org
Subject: Re: Roadmap very out of date (ITS#4993)
Date: Tue Oct  9 19:32:33 2007

> Full_Name: Bevan Bennett
> Version: NA
> OS: NA
> URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/
> Submission from: (NULL) (66.59.247.209)
> 
> 
> The roadmap at http://www.openldap.org/software/roadmap.html has not been
> updated since January of 2006, and lists version 2.4 as being expected in
"Q1
of
> 2006". Since we're now nearly done with Q2 of 2007, this is clearly not
the
> case.
> 
> Someone should pop in and update the roadmap to reflect the last 16 months
of
> progress or lack thereof.
> 
> 

Time to update this now?

Thanks.