Logged in as guest
Viewing Incoming/6874 Full headers
Major security issue: yes no
Notes: no info Notification:
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 13:37:46 +0000 From: dieter@dkluenter.de To: openldap-its@OpenLDAP.org Subject: slapd crashes while modifying a database
Full_Name: Dieter Kluenter Version: 2.4.24 OS: SLES11_x64 URL: Submission from: (NULL) (88.71.14.24) While modifying a database, either subordinate or not, slapd crashes. Debugging and configuration information can be found here: http://pastebin.de/16349 (debugging) http://pastebin.de/16350 (slapd.conf) linked libraries are /usr/lib/openldap> ldd slapd linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff8e9e1000) libldap_r-2.4.so.2 => /usr/lib64/libldap_r-2.4.so.2 (0x00007f633361e000) liblber-2.4.so.2 => /usr/lib64/liblber-2.4.so.2 (0x00007f633340f000) libltdl.so.7 => /usr/lib64/libltdl.so.7 (0x00007f6333205000) libdb-4.5.so => /usr/lib64/libdb-4.5.so (0x00007f6332ece000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f6332cb1000) libslp.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libslp.so.1 (0x00007f6332a97000) libsasl2.so.2 => /usr/lib64/libsasl2.so.2 (0x00007f633287c000) libcrypto.so.1.0.0 => /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 (0x00007f63324cd000) libcrypt.so.1 => /lib64/libcrypt.so.1 (0x00007f6332292000) libwrap.so.0 => /lib64/libwrap.so.0 (0x00007f6332087000) libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007f6331d27000) libresolv.so.2 => /lib64/libresolv.so.2 (0x00007f6331b10000) libssl.so.1.0.0 => /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0 (0x00007f63318b4000) libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f63316b0000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f633386f000) libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00007f633149a000) -Dieter
From: Ralf Haferkamp <rhafer@suse.de> To: dieter@dkluenter.de Subject: Re: (ITS#6874) slapd crashes while modifying a database Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:39:08 +0100 Cc: openldap-its@openldap.org
Am Samstag 19 M=E4rz 2011, 14:37:46 schrieb dieter@dkluenter.de: > While modifying a database, either subordinate or not, slapd crashes. > Debugging and configuration information can be found here: > http://pastebin.de/16349 (debugging) > http://pastebin.de/16350 (slapd.conf) I wonder if such a configuration is even supposed to work. The accesslog=20 overlay on the master is configured for the glued database=20 (dc=3Ddkluenter,dc=3Dde). On the slave however you have individual syncrepl= =20 configuration for each subordinate database. Wouldn't it be correct to=20 have separate accesslog databases for the subordinates? Additionally I think that at least the "overlay syncprov" for the=20 subordinate databases on the master is wrong (as syncprov is already=20 configured for the glued database). Not sure if it is harmful though. A more selfcontained and stripped down example configuration with actual=20 data and information on which operation exactly fails could also help=20 debugging this (assuming that your config turns out to be valid). Ralf
______________ © Copyright 2013, OpenLDAP Foundation, info@OpenLDAP.org