OpenLDAP
Up to top level
Build   Contrib   Development   Documentation   Historical   Incoming   Software Bugs   Software Enhancements   Web  

Logged in as guest

Viewing Incoming/5862
Full headers

From: h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no
Subject: Assert control ignored on non-database entries
Compose comment
Download message
State:
0 replies:
0 followups:

Major security issue: yes  no

Notes:

Notification:


Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:27:06 GMT
From: h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no
To: openldap-its@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Assert control ignored on non-database entries
Full_Name: Hallvard B Furuseth
Version: HEAD
OS: Linux
URL: 
Submission from: (NULL) (129.240.6.233)
Submitted by: hallvard


slapd does not apply the Assert control to non-database entries
(at least the root and subschema entries), yet does not reject
a critical control either.

I have not explored the magnitutde of the problem: Where the
control can get ignored, and which other controls are ignored.

$ ldapsearch -LLLx -e\!assert='(objectClass=person)' -b "" -s base
dn:
objectClass: top
objectClass: OpenLDAProotDSE

$ ldapsearch -LLLx -e\!assert='(objectClass=person)' -b cn=subschema -s base
dn: cn=Subschema
objectClass: top
objectClass: subentry
objectClass: subschema
objectClass: extensibleObject
cn: Subschema


-b "" -s sub does apply the control with database bdb + suffix "".
Don't know about back-sql.
However I imagine it varies how careful backends "" are about generating
the root DSE when suffix == "" so controls can be applied to it.  Might
need a backend flag which says whether the backend does this, and reject
the critical controls with unwillingToPerform if this flag is not set.

Up to top level
Build   Contrib   Development   Documentation   Historical   Incoming   Software Bugs   Software Enhancements   Web  

Logged in as guest


The OpenLDAP Issue Tracking System uses a hacked version of JitterBug

______________
© Copyright 2009, OpenLDAP Foundation, info@OpenLDAP.org