[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Appropriate index for <= >= filter on generalizedTime (Re: reqStart<= slow)

To: openldap-technical@openldap.org
Subject: Re: Appropriate index for <= >= filter on generalizedTime (Re: reqStart<= slow)
From: Roman Rybalko <openldap@romanr.name>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 22:32:00 +0400
In-reply-to: <5060A53D.6070406@symas.com>
References: <4F885B83.5090503@stroeder.com> <4F8966C0.2000401@symas.com> <4F897461.5070504@stroeder.com> <4F897A9C.2000102@symas.com> <50608a2b.8adc320a.45e8.ffffa76eSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <50609F04.9020207@romanr.name> <5060A53D.6070406@symas.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0

24.09.2012 22:23, Howard Chu ÐÐÑÐÑ:
>> (&(logTime>=201209201440+0400)(logTime<=201209201450+0400)) - 57sec
>> (|(logTime=20120920144001+0400)(logTime=20120920144008+0400)) - 0.03sec
> Use a correct filter. Your clauses above use invalid syntax.
Point me please, where exactly my syntax is invalid?

-- 
WBR,
Roman Rybalko

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Appropriate index for <= >= filter on generalizedTime (Re: reqStart<= slow)
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

References:
- Appropriate index for <= >= filter on generalizedTime (Re: reqStart<= slow)
  - From: Roman Rybalko <openldap@romanr.name>
- Re: Appropriate index for <= >= filter on generalizedTime (Re: reqStart<= slow)
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Appropriate index for <= >= filter on generalizedTime (Re: reqStart<= slow)
Next by Date: Re: Appropriate index for <= >= filter on generalizedTime (Re: reqStart<= slow)
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread