[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: critical applications

To: Friedrich Locke <friedrich.locke@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: critical applications
From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:13:47 -0700
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <CANMDHqcA7EcBV+36wtTByrZ6mRNZgEfMez61QCJE4Dv472GCoA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANMDHqcA7EcBV+36wtTByrZ6mRNZgEfMez61QCJE4Dv472GCoA@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/16.0 Firefox/16.0 SeaMonkey/2.13a1

Friedrich Locke wrote:
> Dear friends,
> 
> i am planning to use openldap 2.4.26 and bdb 4.6.21v0 for mission
> critical application mailing system.
> I tried some time ago i tried to implement a mail server using qmail,
> qmail-ldap patch, openldap and bdb but while time passed and email
> were coming and going, slapd was eating all system memory and needed
> to be restart. I wonder if someone in the mailing list have used such
> technologies so far and with which degree of success ?

When starting a new deployment, it makes no sense to use anything older than
the most current release. 2.4.26 is over a year old, you should be using
2.4.32 now.

-- 
  -- Howard Chu
  CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
  Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/

References:
- critical applications
  - From: Friedrich Locke <friedrich.locke@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: representing file pathnames
Next by Date: Re: Internal telephone extension number
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread