Re: DEL don't get synced

[Buchan Milne <bgmilne@staff.telkomsa.net>]

On Tuesday, 21 February 2012 12:41:40 Marc Patermann wrote:
> Buchan,
> 
> Buchan Milne schrieb (21.02.2012 11:38 Uhr):
> > As far as I have read in changelogs and ITS, anything from
> > OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_4 (including 2.4.29) before:
> > 
> > commit 10c81e2a46c9b603ba1dfcf53422573d5068ba04
> > Author: Howard Chu <hyc@openldap.org>
> > Date:   Sun Feb 12 21:07:25 2012 -0800
> > 
> >     ITS#7162 Revert "ITS#7052 ignore Adds with too old entryCSN"
> >     
> >     This reverts commit ba4366eae098c0e4950a78b1da8d79ffe8b34fee.
> >     The patch caused a regression (ITS#7162).
> > 
> > will probably still be broken.
> 
> Thank you. But what does this mean to me exactly?
> What is the best to try now?

Current OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_4 from git, or 2.4.29 with the 2 or 3 commits in 
OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_4, or a package that has them (I have RPMs internally, but 
my public repo is down for a bit).


Regards,
Buchan