[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Loading LDAP schema files into cn=config

To: Nick Milas <nick@eurobjects.com>
Subject: Re: Loading LDAP schema files into cn=config
From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 03:50:00 -0700
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <4E9EA1F5.3070007@eurobjects.com>
References: <4E0AFDB9.7090208@siriusit.co.uk> <4E0B0588.6070305@symas.com> <4E0B0E60.2050909@siriusit.co.uk> <4E0B139C.3090604@symas.com> <4E0B27E8.7010106@siriusit.co.uk> <4E0B339A.9030201@up247solution.com> <4E0B4B24.1060704@truelite.it> <4E0B5340.40209@siriusit.co.uk> <4E0C9057.2060101@truelite.it> <4E0E01CE.3080604@stroeder.com> <20110701224749.GA25822@iniquitous.lan> <4E0F06AC.6030005@truelite.it> <4E0F2071.9040504@eurobjects.com> <4E0F5225.20705@stroeder.com> <4E0FA742.30102@symas.com> <4E9EA1F5.3070007@eurobjects.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0a1) Gecko/20111001 Firefox/10.0a1 SeaMonkey/2.7a1

Nick Milas wrote:

By the way, a question: in case someone manually deletes (accidentally
or intentionally) a rule so that a gap in numbering occurs, will
OpenLDAP continue to evaluate subsequent rules? For example, if someone
deletes existing rule {12} (current numbering scheme), will the system
evaluate ACLs after {11} (like {13}, {14} etc.)?


Read http://highlandsun.com/hyc/drafts/draft-chu-ldap-xordered-xx.html

--
  -- Howard Chu
  CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
  Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Loading LDAP schema files into cn=config
  - From: Ondrej Kuznik <ondrej.kuznik@acision.com>

References:
- Re: Loading LDAP schema files into cn=config
  - From: Nick Milas <nick@eurobjects.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Loading LDAP schema files into cn=config
Next by Date: Re: Loading LDAP schema files into cn=config
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread