Re: Overlay memberof does not work with groupOfUniqueNames

To: JOSE L MARTINEZ-AVIAL <jlmagc@gmail.com>

Subject: Re: Overlay memberof does not work with groupOfUniqueNames

From: sim123 <Sim3159@gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 12:06:38 -0700

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4Lz1I3hezteBmc7X8n8wxn0UkhniUGwDm3gR1GGZ95E=; b=YV9S4gq74YH25lXcMBp6L11LdUPZqTPiPr6RLqMw9rdE2jUjN3RcH3o3SYfVyFbA38 OioOkPsTvNqpQFV+GiDCiypTHAAHFsrg/6fg4HbCq8uvTVgNXBV3tedka1CIgkR4BfcH xdFYjFXkZUVSN3wn+M1abJ3F2/nhDVKLejC6w=

In-reply-to: <CAHB4ARsT8F9ot6MsbPxoeXoemkNs2N14SGBoXUXt9i28UV7nwg@mail.gmail.com>

References: <CAHB4ARt-czbLbmbBVrJiBUnSMKSngztQqpJ728RvRc=xGzYErw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHB4ARtH1PX_ygtsh1OYo_MObeoifnT3vU3MQ5q5Bz85saFCpg@mail.gmail.com> <CADKqS0xgPN-oYQmx2f0jHCExuT_UCUCTNxM27SAd4xm1Cwxcvg@mail.gmail.com> <CAHB4ARsT8F9ot6MsbPxoeXoemkNs2N14SGBoXUXt9i28UV7nwg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:00 PM, JOSE L MARTINEZ-AVIAL <jlmagc@gmail.com> wrote:

I just added the following two options to the slapd.conf, after the declaration of the overlay:

overlay memberof
memberof-group-oc groupOfUniqueNames
memberof-member-ad uniquemember

HIH.

JL

Thanks, will try that.

2011/10/7 sim123 <Sim3159@gmail.com>

On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:22 AM, JOSE L MARTINEZ-AVIAL <jlmagc@gmail.com> wrote:

Never mind, I just found it can setup on the slapd.conf.

JL

2011/10/7 JOSE L MARTINEZ-AVIAL <jlmagc@gmail.com>

Hi,
I've an openldap 2.4.23 over RHEL4. I compilled it with the option to use overlay memberof, and it's been working well so far when I created groupOfNames. The issue is that I need to switch to groupOfUniqueNames instead of groupOfNames. When I do that, it seems that the overlay does not work, so I don't receive any group at all when I do a search returning memberof. Is it possible to setup the overlay to do that?

Thank you

Jose Luis

Could you please let me know how did you set it up? I needed to do it for groupOfUniqueNames and thought it only works on groupOfNames (my bad !!). My life would be so much easier if I get GroupOfUniqueNames working.

Thanks