[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: cn=config replication to consumer / slave servers

To: Christopher Strider Cook <ccook@pandora.com>
Subject: Re: cn=config replication to consumer / slave servers
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:57:37 -0700
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <4DA8DA83.2020607@pandora.com>
References: <4DA79137.5030606@pandora.com> <B8499AD633BE7784DC23FACD@[192.168.1.2]> <4DA8926F.8020804@symas.com> <4DA8DA83.2020607@pandora.com>

--On Friday, April 15, 2011 4:53 PM -0700 Christopher Strider Cook<ccook@pandora.com> wrote:

No, that never worked well. Use suffixmassage in the syncrepl config
statement. (Added in 2.4.24)

Yes that looks like the right path.. I've just recompiled to gain this
superpower... But:


Have you looked at test059 which tests setting this up?

--Quanah


--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

References:
- cn=config replication to consumer / slave servers
  - From: Christopher Strider Cook <ccook@pandora.com>
- Re: cn=config replication to consumer / slave servers
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
- Re: cn=config replication to consumer / slave servers
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
- Re: cn=config replication to consumer / slave servers
  - From: Christopher Strider Cook <ccook@pandora.com>

Prev by Date: Re: cn=config replication to consumer / slave servers
Next by Date: Re: cn=config replication to consumer / slave servers
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread