[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: Possible bug in ldap_get_values_len?
- To: openldap-technical@openldap.org
- Subject: Re: Possible bug in ldap_get_values_len?
- From: Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:11:20 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kpn5yq7WgXYAbhAn6hRnUMcn0cajKdNs6muPkuSWzmE=; b=tNS1MP57K/DZjvdAD8cuuX35jY/3eLlEd9nXo1EmIIK6xm0pFKZVDkYBFXlusX4P1s E+qRVcHNUGQJFMW62tlzV3TKxJ1okcmyVePvAiT43cQVb25Bm391239Qc2tXwD1DuVfL /EPLXbKkN3jNBd9Pi+kQllIdMGitZNXKCjIJE=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MGtxLfFkMvNgxX3d8Ztsvdje9uZ0ShSgHOaEXPyFHO3zaAWjLC9wPwaFwM+MKv8AV3 ARxcJEOTagNq5iJqwbVZQ3L592FLsqZw6vm+VxkpizSweCitsYuIqLIjoFJ0Lnu4gzXl q1TX+jOTUWrPbTifw2DHBdoGYtyxZfbwmAan0=
- In-reply-to: <4CBC260E.1020200@symas.com>
- References: <1287244805-sup-2515@ezyang> <4CBC260E.1020200@symas.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4
On 10/18/10 12:48 PM, Howard Chu wrote:
But it's certainly stupid for the server to attach the attribute to
the response with no values, since this is obviously NOT an attrsOnly
search response.
What about an AttributeType with an OctetString syntax ? It may have an
empty value...
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com