[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: SSL strangeness

To: Edward Capriolo <edlinuxguru@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: SSL strangeness
From: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:59:05 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Victor Mataré <matare@lih.rwth-aachen.de>, openldap-software@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <cbbf4b570910290855g7c9381f3y78cdab3204fdad8c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4AE99F1C.2010308@lih.rwth-aachen.de> <cbbf4b570910290855g7c9381f3y78cdab3204fdad8c@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Edward Capriolo wrote:

So does anyone know the truth about this? Is ldaps considered
deprecated in some circles?

As a rule of thumb, implicit-SSL protocols are not IETF Standards Track,and their StartTLS brethren are. In the case of LDAP,http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/605.html is on point.

References:
- SSL strangeness
  - From: Victor Mataré <matare@lih.rwth-aachen.de>
- Re: SSL strangeness
  - From: Edward Capriolo <edlinuxguru@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Availability of the ldap_initialize(3) interface
Next by Date: Re: Slow replication in mirrormode
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread