[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Mirror Mode, replicas and delta-syncrepl

To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
Subject: Re: Mirror Mode, replicas and delta-syncrepl
From: Sam Tran <stlist@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:59:14 -0400
Cc: openldap-software@openldap.org
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dq4ifZ0aiHQtlmlgVz1luWxMK1GIE8Nf0DrsQx3+jIg=; b=rkTVRwxcLSP86/ecvxaDIhZP/H52TpfhNJqwihEH/UjtIhXa6lIRBvB/oVpWHSXQOC X+6knsbHgDPUw8N8GGePhhBG/tFKTfhdx84Ig+NR+3HV08fAJrIs7tHzHIN6t4VWgPht cCdyYa3JPNzp3sJWtgqqYbSHyo/NIi0pIfVqQ=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=da5OZKIddrmROHhEcGYUjYdHwy3Q5kBerz5GcYbfXopCPQdY1zfBbaUohmHuOmR4FR tuB2DHVFEc42Kf4AsCeEqKbhbfazj30aQ+Xw8bBgpdNiP84dpaLaJHWamVkIaMAlTg9S zyaa16ZYIENIUn89KNnsGoFSmVgb2uZaD0R4I=
In-reply-to: <9971D124AD3A8B9508E2FAB8@192.168.1.199>
References: <cee681b00910221334tf3acc58r5f87fd85945485bc@mail.gmail.com> <5F484C8C988AC5476841708F@192.168.1.199> <cee681b00910221837l51f9ecf9y94b5cb1198a8d6bc@mail.gmail.com> <9971D124AD3A8B9508E2FAB8@192.168.1.199>

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com> wrote:
> --On Thursday, October 22, 2009 9:37 PM -0400 Sam Tran <stlist@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I was planning to use the load balancer in the 2nd configuration as
>> well. In both cases only a single master will receive the write
>> requests. The 2nd configuration would still work in the event of a
>> failure of the load balancer.
>
>
> I don't know if delta-syncrepl can handle two syncrepl statements getting
> the same data.  I would think that would cause a lot of problems.  Although
> I guess it would know it already got that change?   I'm curious to know the
> results of your experiments. ;)
>

Based on your last post on this thread:
http://archive.netbsd.se/?ml=OpenLDAP-software&a=2009-03&t=10149068
I thought the replicas would be able to handle two masters in a mirror
mode configuration.
Did I miss something?

References:
- Mirror Mode, replicas and delta-syncrepl
  - From: Sam Tran <stlist@gmail.com>
- Re: Mirror Mode, replicas and delta-syncrepl
  - From: Sam Tran <stlist@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: question: dynamic groups / reverse group membership
Next by Date: Re: syncrepl problem with 2.4.19
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread