[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Why Use accesslog overlay?

To: Pete Giesin <pgiesin@hubcitymedia.com>
Subject: Re: Why Use accesslog overlay?
From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 22:53:17 +0100
Cc: openldap-software@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <476598d20903201305y36dfc017n7b37c0280b9065e0@mail.gmail.com>
References: <476598d20903201208y77a960f0vd0370053017f1d00@mail.gmail.com> <49C3F4EA.8090902@csub.edu> <476598d20903201305y36dfc017n7b37c0280b9065e0@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 SeaMonkey/1.1.15

Pete Giesin wrote:
> Turning off the accesslog completely did increase writes but only to
> ~200 per sec. That is still not an acceptable number.

For determining what's an acceptable number one would need some more
information:
- which OpenLDAP version (2.4 is faster on writing)
- how large is your whole database?
- indexing configuration? (the more the slower)
- how big are the entries written? (the bigger the slower)
- hardware used?

Ciao, Michael.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why Use accesslog overlay?
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>

References:
- Why Use accesslog overlay?
  - From: Pete Giesin <pgiesin@hubcitymedia.com>
- Re: Why Use accesslog overlay?
  - From: Russell Jackson <raj@csub.edu>
- Re: Why Use accesslog overlay?
  - From: Pete Giesin <pgiesin@hubcitymedia.com>

Prev by Date: Re: delta-syncrepl missing changes
Next by Date: Re: Why Use accesslog overlay?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread