Re: replication issue

[John Morrissey <jwm@horde.net>]

On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 06:09:49PM -0500, Aaron Richton wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, John Morrissey wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 09:13:49PM +0100, Dieter Kluenter wrote:
> > > it might not be related to your replication problem, but setting a
> > > sizelimit=unlimited in syncrepl configuration reduces the chance that
> > > clientside limitations come into effect.
> > > If you require starttls and integrity you should at least add
> > > tls_cacert option to syncrepl configuration.
> > 
> > For client operations, doesn't syncrepl operate as the rootdn, which is
> > exempt from size/time limitations?
> 
> Internally, syncrepl acts as the rootdn. However, when going over the wire
> to the provider, it must be configured with a binddn and credentials. 
> Certainly there is nothing in the client stopping you from specifying the
> rootdn as the syncrepl binddn, but that is not considered best practice.

Right. Dieter mentioned "clientside limitations," which I took to mean
internal operations performed on the consumer.

john
-- 
John Morrissey          _o            /\         ----  __o
jwm@horde.net        _-< \_          /  \       ----  <  \,
www.horde.net/    __(_)/_(_)________/    \_______(_) /_(_)__