[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: 2.4 syncprov implementation

To: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Subject: Re: 2.4 syncprov implementation
From: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 20:56:49 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: openldap-software@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <48BF26A0.6040606@symas.com>
References: <Pine.SOC.4.64.0809031943580.4521@toolbox.rutgers.edu> <48BF26A0.6040606@symas.com>

On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Howard Chu wrote:

Specifically, are 2.3 slaves and 2.4 providers expected to interact well?
Yes, if it's a new enough 2.3.

Where/how are the differences handled? (There are differences, right, like entryCSN time resolution?) "New enough 2.3" has smarts to read these? Or 2.4 knows how to send a dumbed down format?

References:
- 2.4 syncprov implementation
  - From: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>
- Re: 2.4 syncprov implementation
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.4 syncprov implementation
Next by Date: new user
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread