[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Upgrade to 2.3.40 -> failed index

To: "Paul B. Henson" <henson@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Upgrade to 2.3.40 -> failed index
From: Andreas Hasenack <ahasenack@terra.com.br>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 10:46:24 -0200
Cc: openldap-software@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.55.0802041207190.3132@loogie.intranet.csupomona.edu>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.55.0802030710060.208@loogie.intranet.csupomona.edu> <47A73113.2050805@stroeder.com> <Pine.GSO.4.55.0802041207190.3132@loogie.intranet.csupomona.edu>

On Seg, 2008-02-04 at 12:07 -0800, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, [iso-8859-1] Michael StrÃder wrote:
> 
> > Paul B. Henson wrote:
> > > Feb  3 03:50:36 derp idmgmt[3722]: error deleting user cjlindsay: DN index
> > > delete failed (LDAP)
> >
> > Everything right with ownership/permissions on the data files?
> 
> Yes. Nothing had changed on the server since the upgrade. There were
> successful deletes before this one and some successful ones after.

Was your OL 2.3.40 built with the same version of berkeley DB as the
previous 2.3.35 one? (Sorry if you already answered that)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Upgrade to 2.3.40 -> failed index
  - From: "Paul B. Henson" <henson@acm.org>

References:
- Upgrade to 2.3.40 -> failed index
  - From: "Paul B. Henson" <henson@acm.org>
- Re: Upgrade to 2.3.40 -> failed index
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
- Re: Upgrade to 2.3.40 -> failed index
  - From: "Paul B. Henson" <henson@acm.org>

Prev by Date: volunteers wanted
Next by Date: Re: large ldap server recommendation
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread