[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: regarding custom schema

To: openldap-software@openldap.org
Subject: Re: regarding custom schema
From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:49:23 +0200
In-reply-to: <1191246585.5091.2.camel@aleph.wmmi.net>
References: <000b01c8040f$5b159220$5219120a@china.huawei.com> <1191246585.5091.2.camel@aleph.wmmi.net>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070802 SeaMonkey/1.1.4

Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> 
> Because it makes no sense.  Look-up the meanings of AUXILIARY and
> STRUCTURAL. 

See RFC 4512 "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Directory
Information Models".

Citing from section 2.4.3:

  "Auxiliary object classes cannot subclass structural object classes."

Ciao, Michael.

-- 
Michael Ströder
E-Mail: michael@stroeder.com
http://www.stroeder.com

References:
- RE: regarding custom schema
  - From: Arunachalam Parthasarathy <arunachalamp@huawei.com>
- RE: regarding custom schema
  - From: Adam Tauno Williams <adamtaunowilliams@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Structural Object Classes
Next by Date: Re: strange issue with pwdAccountLockedTime
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread