[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: regarding custom schema

To: openldap-software@openldap.org
Subject: RE: regarding custom schema
From: Adam Tauno Williams <adamtaunowilliams@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 09:49:45 -0400
In-reply-to: <000b01c8040f$5b159220$5219120a@china.huawei.com>
References: <000b01c8040f$5b159220$5219120a@china.huawei.com>


> 1) Second choice of making new objectClass STRUCTURAL is fine for me ,
> but will there be any restrictions for new STRUCTURAL object classes
> to be created from any parent (for instance, organizationalUnit)

Only that they be STRUCTURAL.

> And from this, new STRUCTURAL class, if I derive one more hierarchy
> down , will there be any restrictions for that grand child object
> class.

None beyond what apply to all object classes.  Proprietary/custom schema
is treated no differently than standard schema.

> 2) Can I know why is that restriction that AUXILIARY cannot be derived
> from STRUCTURAL? 

Because it makes no sense.  Look-up the meanings of AUXILIARY and
STRUCTURAL. 

-- 
Adam Tauno Williams, Network & Systems Administrator
Consultant - http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com
Developer - http://www.opengroupware.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: regarding custom schema
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>

References:
- RE: regarding custom schema
  - From: Arunachalam Parthasarathy <arunachalamp@huawei.com>

Prev by Date: RE: restricting attributes to become RDN , which objects are created
Next by Date: RE: restricting attributes to become RDN , which objects are created
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread