[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: regarding hdb

To: Arunachalam Parthasarathy <arunachalamp@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: regarding hdb
From: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:15:48 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: openldap-software@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <000b01c7c863$6c8f32f0$5219120a@china.huawei.com>
References: <000b01c7c863$6c8f32f0$5219120a@china.huawei.com>

On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Arunachalam Parthasarathy wrote:

If i use database as hdb , did it use Sleepycat Berkeley DB package to store
data?

back-hdb and back-bdb both use Sleepycat as their underlying storage engine.

When we specify database dierective as hdb, so I need to take any special
considerations as i came across the following the openldap FAQ -> "back-hdb
tends to require larger caches than back-bdb" ?

I believe you can find discussion of tuning the bdb/hdb cache in the FAQ-O-Matic and in the list archives.

References:
- regarding hdb
  - From: Arunachalam Parthasarathy <arunachalamp@huawei.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Replication architecture
Next by Date: Re: Recommended back-end
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread