[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Recommended back-end

To: Daniel Corbe <daniel.junkmail@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Recommended back-end
From: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:11:56 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: openldap-software@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <cceb89df0707170634t38aa034cqa816cde8b7679c81@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cceb89df0707170634t38aa034cqa816cde8b7679c81@mail.gmail.com>

Pretty unviable and quite a bit slower. As an aside, the "default" nowadays is bdb/hdb (Sleepycat) based.

http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/378.html

On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Daniel Corbe wrote:

I was wondering what the viability of switching to a MySQL-based back-end
would be and how much slower it is compared to the default gdbm back-end.
-Daniel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Recommended back-end
  - From: "matthew sporleder" <msporleder@gmail.com>
- Re: Recommended back-end
  - From: "Daniel Corbe" <daniel.junkmail@gmail.com>

References:
- Recommended back-end
  - From: "Daniel Corbe" <daniel.junkmail@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Replication architecture
Next by Date: Re: Replication architecture
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread