[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Lock is no longer valid / deferring operation

To: Gavin Henry <ghenry@suretecsystems.com>, Toby Blake <toby@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Lock is no longer valid / deferring operation
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 17:00:33 -0700
Cc: openldap-software@openldap.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <59275.212.159.59.85.1183578039.squirrel@webmail.suretecsystems.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707041320590.23577@syd.inf.ed.ac.uk> <59275.212.159.59.85.1183578039.squirrel@webmail.suretecsystems.com>

--On Wednesday, July 04, 2007 8:40 PM +0100 Gavin Henry <ghenry@suretecsystems.com> wrote:

We're running openldap 2.3.35 with ITS#4924 and ITS#4925 patches with
a bdb backend running 4.2.52 with all 6 recommended patches.
I hope you mean 5, as there are only 5 listed on the Oracle site.

There are 6 recommended patches to BDB 4.2.52, 5 of which come from the Oracle site.

--Quanah


--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
--------------------
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

References:
- Lock is no longer valid / deferring operation
  - From: Toby Blake <toby@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Re: Lock is no longer valid / deferring operation
  - From: "Gavin Henry" <ghenry@suretecsystems.com>

Prev by Date: Re: reference to other entry - question
Next by Date: Re: Lock is no longer valid / deferring operation
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread