Re: slurpd replication and openldap versions

["matthew sporleder" <msporleder@gmail.com>]

On 6/11/07, Matthias Leopold <matthias@aic.at> wrote:
> hi
>
> i want to know in general what the caveats are when replicating ldap
> data with slurpd between openldap servers of different major versions. i
> would be especially interested in knowing if it is adviseable to
> replicate from a 2.3 master to 2.2 slaves (or the other way round). the
> reason for asking this is that i have noticed that in the present setup
> replication from 2.0 to 2.2 produces .rej files which are 10 times
> bigger than those resulting from "same generation" (2.0 <-> 2.0)
> replication. or are there any special configuration options for this
> situation?


I had good luck using a 2.3 master to a 2.1 slave, so 2.3 -> 2.2
should work fine.