[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: slurpd from a

To: "Aaron Richton" <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>
Subject: Re: slurpd from a
From: "Alec Thomas" <alec@swapoff.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 05:43:00 -0700
Cc: Buchan Milne <bgmilne@staff.telkomsa.net>, openldap-software@openldap.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <Pine.SOC.4.64.0703270807181.20609@toolbox.rutgers.edu>
References: <5b52d53b0703261907u479e415bve2191dfbfe8b9b87@mail.gmail.com> <200703270819.12941.bgmilne@staff.telkomsa.net> <5b52d53b0703270051jfaa8b54x66383b674466106b@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.SOC.4.64.0703270807181.20609@toolbox.rutgers.edu>

On 3/27/07, Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu> wrote:

You can "push" from syncrepl today. See the list archives and, I believe,
the tests configs.


As I understand it, and other threads confirm, even though syncrepl
logically supports a "push" based mechanism, from a network
perspective it's a connection from the replica to the master which is
not ideal from a DMZ.

From a previous thread [1], it sounds like 2.4 will support this model

using a hidden proxy database. For 2.3 it sounds like it may be
possible by using the attr keyword to the replica statement. I'll play
with this tomorrow.

[1] http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200609/msg00071.html
--
Evolution: Taking care of those too stupid to take care of themselves.

References:
- slurpd from a
  - From: "Alec Thomas" <alec@swapoff.org>
- Re: slurpd from a
  - From: Buchan Milne <bgmilne@staff.telkomsa.net>
- Re: slurpd from a
  - From: "Alec Thomas" <alec@swapoff.org>
- Re: slurpd from a
  - From: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: how to do TLS encryption ?
Next by Date: Re: SSL3_READ_BYTES:sslv3 alert handshake failure
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread