[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Synchronization to distant locations over high-latency/low-bandwidth

To: Jan-Piet Mens <jpm@retail-sc.com>
Subject: Re: Synchronization to distant locations over high-latency/low-bandwidth
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:53:14 -0800
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <20060314183021.GA29219@m1.intdus.retail-sc.com>
References: <20060314134041.GA20662@m1.intdus.retail-sc.com> <FDADBEE1369764ADDC3F625A@cadabra-sw.stanford.edu> <20060314183021.GA29219@m1.intdus.retail-sc.com>

--On Tuesday, March 14, 2006 7:30 PM +0100 Jan-Piet Mens <jpm@retail-sc.com> wrote:

On Tue Mar 14 2006 at 19:13:35 CET, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:


delta-syncrepl would probably be your best bet.  Normal syncrepl has
much  larger bandwidth requirements than slurpd or delta-syncrepl.


Do you have pointers to documentation? Neither FAQoMatic or admin guides
carry the term "delta-syncrepl".


See test043 in the tests/ directory.

--Quanah


--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITS/Shared Application Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html

References:
- Synchronization to distant locations over high-latency/low-bandwidth
  - From: Jan-Piet Mens <jpm@retail-sc.com>
- Re: Synchronization to distant locations over high-latency/low-bandwidth
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
- Re: Synchronization to distant locations over high-latency/low-bandwidth
  - From: Jan-Piet Mens <jpm@retail-sc.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Openldap doesn't build shared libraries
Next by Date: Re: Synchronization to distant locations over high-latency/low-bandwidth
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread