[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: "threads" v. "concurrency"?

To: Ben Beuchler <insyte@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: "threads" v. "concurrency"?
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 08:56:49 -0700
Cc: openldap <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <479b70ed05082715017e2ab7e0@mail.gmail.com>
References: <479b70ed05082715017e2ab7e0@mail.gmail.com>

At 03:01 PM 8/27/2005, Ben Beuchler wrote:
>While "threads" seems pretty clearly to be the hard limit on the
>maximum number of slapd threads that will be spawned, how does
>"concurrency" relate?  Any good rules-of-thumb for how it should be
>set? 

A general rule of thumb would be to use the defaults unless
it can demonstrated (through bench marking or other means)
that some non-default value is significantly better.

Kurt

References:
- "threads" v. "concurrency"?
  - From: Ben Beuchler <insyte@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: where is the namingContext?
Next by Date: Re: where is the namingContext?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread