[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: nested/coupled <who> clauses in ACLs

To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: nested/coupled <who> clauses in ACLs
From: "Eric A. Hall" <ehall@ehsco.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 00:21:38 -0400
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <B7A4DAA7950F2FDB0AEE1FE3@[0.1.0.4]>
References: <42CF3312.2070102@ehsco.com> <B7A4DAA7950F2FDB0AEE1FE3@[0.1.0.4]>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)


On 7/8/2005 11:25 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> 
> --On Friday, July 08, 2005 10:14 PM -0400 "Eric A. Hall" <ehall@ehsco.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>>Let's say that I want to make a group of entries accessible to anonymous,
>>but only when it is connecting from localhost. EG:
>>
>>  access to <foo>
>>    by anonymous(peername.ip=127.0.0.1)   read
>>    by *                                  none
> 
> Did you read the slapd.access manpage?

Yes, and I'm still looking for an answer

-- 
Eric A. Hall                                        http://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols          http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: nested/coupled <who> clauses in ACLs
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>

References:
- nested/coupled <who> clauses in ACLs
  - From: "Eric A. Hall" <ehall@ehsco.com>
- Re: nested/coupled <who> clauses in ACLs
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: nested/coupled <who> clauses in ACLs
Next by Date: Re: Server 2.3.4 & back-sql (+ back.c dif) cannot modify database
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread