[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Future of OL 2.2 [auf Viren überprüft]

To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: Future of OL 2.2 [auf Viren überprüft]
From: Samuel Tran <stran@amnh.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:51:43 -0400
Cc: Hans Moser <hans.moser@ofd-sth.niedersachsen.de>, openLDAP-software <openLDAP-software@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <6.2.1.2.0.20050620120054.08680048@mail.openldap.org>
References: <42B6C10E.6090502@ofd-sth.niedersachsen.de> <6.2.1.2.0.20050620120054.08680048@mail.openldap.org>

On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 12:06 -0700, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
> At 06:13 AM 6/20/2005, Hans Moser wrote:
> >How long will OpenLDAP 2.2.x be maintained,
> 
> The Project has no set date, at least not yet, for moving 2.2
> to historic status.  I would expect a date to be set until some
> time after 2.3 is marked "stable".
> 
> >while version 2.3.x is released [and will become "Stable" soon?]?
> 
> When it ready.
> 
> >Is it recommended to change to the 2.3-branch in the very near future?
> 
> I think folks should consider using 2.3.

Can an LDAP 2.3.x master replicate to an LDAP 2.2.x slave?

Thanks,
Sam

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Future of OL 2.2 [auf Viren ÃberprÃft]
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>

References:
- Future of OL 2.2 [auf Viren überprüft]
  - From: Hans Moser <hans.moser@ofd-sth.niedersachsen.de>
- Re: Future of OL 2.2 [auf Viren überprüft]
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: RE: Mapping through SASL does not work
Next by Date: Re: Future of OL 2.2 [auf Viren ÃberprÃft]
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread