[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ldbm migrations

To: matthew sporleder <msporleder@gmail.com>, openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: ldbm migrations
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 17:19:28 -0700
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <b0459d5c05052515392d671328@mail.gmail.com>
References: <b0459d5c05052515392d671328@mail.gmail.com>

--On Wednesday, May 25, 2005 6:39 PM -0400 matthew sporleder <msporleder@gmail.com> wrote:

How does moving from an older version of BerkleyDB to a newer version
affect ldbm backends?  Will I have to do some sort of db_upgrade, or
will the newer library not affect ldbm?  I don't see any berkley
libaries linked when I try ldd on slapd.

Why would you use LDBM if you are moving to a newer version of OpenLDAP? There are many many wonderful reasons to move to a more sane and stable backend like BDB (the suggested backend for OpenLDAP 2.1 or greater).

--Quanah

--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITSS/Shared Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html

"These censorship operations against schools and libraries are stronger
than ever in the present religio-political climate. They often focus on
fantasy and sf books, which foster that deadly enemy to bigotry and blind
faith, the imagination." -- Ursula K. Le Guin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ldbm migrations
  - From: matthew sporleder <msporleder@gmail.com>

References:
- ldbm migrations
  - From: matthew sporleder <msporleder@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: ldbm migrations
Next by Date: Re: ldbm migrations
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread