[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Solaris 9 LDAP client - different behaviour with back-bdb and back-ldbm

To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: Solaris 9 LDAP client - different behaviour with back-bdb and back-ldbm
From: Sojka Reinhard <reinhard.sojka@parlinkom.gv.at>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:44:09 +0100
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <6.2.1.2.0.20050322083541.02777620@mail.openldap.org>
References: <1111430721.11654.37.camel@edv4> <6.2.1.2.0.20050322083541.02777620@mail.openldap.org>

On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 08:38 -0800, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:

> This implies that the Solaris client is doing something
> different than ldapsearch(1) and these other clients.
> You should investigate this, possibly by carefully
> examining the server logs for differences.
> 
> Kurt 
> 
hi Kurt,

I have submitted an issue report 10 minutes before you answered ...

it is ITS# 3604


Reinhard

References:
- Solaris 9 LDAP client - different behaviour with back-bdb and back-ldbm
  - From: Reinhard Sojka <reinhard.sojka@parlinkom.gv.at>
- Re: Solaris 9 LDAP client - different behaviour with back-bdb and back-ldbm
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: Re: TLS secure connection to an LDAP server
Next by Date: ldap_start_tls_s() error NOT SUPPORTTED
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread