[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Multimaster Replication

To: Travis Groth <lists@netfoo.org>
Subject: Re: Multimaster Replication
From: Adam Tauno Williams <adam@morrison-ind.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:15:13 -0500
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <41F74238.9050804@netfoo.org>
Organization: Morrison Industries
References: <41F74238.9050804@netfoo.org>

> I was curious as to the current state of multimaster replication. 

See archives, this question gets asked allot.

Always the same answer - experimental, really.

> I can 
> find refrences as to how to do it until 2.1.23...then it seems that if 
> you have an updatedn you must also have an updateref.  Is there an easy 
> way to disable this enforcement?  I would like to use multimaster 
> replication to improve reliability in the event of network failure...I 
> have a few entries that need to be updated in a rather time critical 
> fashion.

Personally I don't see what multimaster buys you that failover &
syncrepl can't provide,  except more complexity.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Multimaster Replication
  - From: Travis Groth <lists@netfoo.org>

References:
- Multimaster Replication
  - From: Travis Groth <lists@netfoo.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Can't build bdb as module
Next by Date: RE: Multimaster Replication
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread