[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Is the Redhat's openldap distribution broken?

To: "Tony Earnshaw" <tonye@billy.demon.nl>, "Openldap list" <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: Is the Redhat's openldap distribution broken?
From: Bruno Negrão <vpopmail@engepel.com.br>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:35:01 -0200
References: <A04B6AE6ED3BD742B64D5B17093F64E291300D@IMSSGPX01.ims.mhm.mhc><20041125105622.F40513@mippet.ci.com.au><00ee01c4d2ee$0ad11320$5100a8c0@egp> <1101396792.25996.33.camel@localhost>

> Am I suposed to remove it and reinstall
openldap from the source?
That\s what I do, for all RHAS/RHEL3 installations I carry out. OL
2.2.17/8 is rock stable, fast, reliable and supported ;)

Ok Toni, I'm convinced.

I downloaded openldap source and I'm trying to install it now.
But the installation is failing because my Berkeley DB is too old.

Since you already installed this source a lot of times, could you list to me which are the software required to install openldap's source?

Also, do you have some good advice in "./configure --options" to use?

Thanks, bruno negrao

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is the Redhat's openldap distribution broken?
  - From: Tony Earnshaw <tonye@billy.demon.nl>

References:
- Why is the difference of "objectclass: organization" and "objectclass: domain"?
  - From: "Tay, Gary" <Gary_Tay@platts.com>
- Re: Why is the difference of "objectclass: organization" and "objectclass: domain"?
  - From: Dave Horsfall <daveh@ci.com.au>
- Is the Redhat's openldap distribution broken?
  - From: Bruno Negrão <vpopmail@engepel.com.br>
- Re: Is the Redhat's openldap distribution broken?
  - From: Tony Earnshaw <tonye@billy.demon.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: Openldap Aci Problem
Next by Date: Re: Is the Redhat's openldap distribution broken?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread