[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Is the Redhat's openldap distribution broken?

To: OpenLDAP Software List <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: Is the Redhat's openldap distribution broken?
From: Andreas Hasenack <andreas@conectiva.com.br>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 11:13:28 -0200
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <00ee01c4d2ee$0ad11320$5100a8c0@egp>
References: <A04B6AE6ED3BD742B64D5B17093F64E291300D@IMSSGPX01.ims.mhm.mhc> <20041125105622.F40513@mippet.ci.com.au> <00ee01c4d2ee$0ad11320$5100a8c0@egp>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i

On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 10:55:29AM -0200, Bruno Negrão wrote:
> I'm starting to use redhat's openldap and I still didn't notice any 
> problem. Does someone know any problem related to the redhat's openldap 
> distribution? Am I suposed to remove it and reinstall openldap from the 
> source?

The main complaint about all stock openldap installations from linux distributions
is that the openldap package tends to be old.

References:
- Why is the difference of "objectclass: organization" and "objectclass: domain"?
  - From: "Tay, Gary" <Gary_Tay@platts.com>
- Re: Why is the difference of "objectclass: organization" and "objectclass: domain"?
  - From: Dave Horsfall <daveh@ci.com.au>
- Is the Redhat's openldap distribution broken?
  - From: Bruno Negrão <vpopmail@engepel.com.br>

Prev by Date: RE: openldap 2.1.30 + gentoo +ssl [self signed problem again]
Next by Date: How to get the Directory's last modification time?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread