[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: start_tls versus ldaps

To: OpenLDAP-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: start_tls versus ldaps
From: Imobach González Sosa <igonzalez@becarios.ulpgc.es>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 10:16:49 +0100
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <411C7B8E.40307@obsidian.co.za>
Organization: Servicio de Informática y Comunicaciones
References: <200408121124.41942.igonzalez@becarios.ulpgc.es> <200408130830.11028.igonzalez@becarios.ulpgc.es> <411C7B8E.40307@obsidian.co.za>
User-agent: KMail/1.6.2

El Viernes, 13 de Agosto de 2004 09:27, escribió:
> Yes, via ACLs (the *ssf statements).

Thank you Buchan, it seems to work pretty fine.

See ya!
-- 
Imobach González Sosa
Servicio de Informática y Comunicaciones de la ULPGC
e-mail: igonzalez@becarios.ulpgc.es
Teléfono: +34 928 459519

References:
- start_tls versus ldaps
  - From: Imobach González Sosa <igonzalez@becarios.ulpgc.es>
- Re: start_tls versus ldaps
  - From: Imobach González Sosa <igonzalez@becarios.ulpgc.es>
- Re: start_tls versus ldaps
  - From: Buchan Milne <bgmilne@obsidian.co.za>

Prev by Date: Re: definition of tag= entries in logs
Next by Date: Re: start_tls versus ldaps
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread