[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: OpenLDAP 2.1 (?) on RedHat Enterprise summary

To: <bgmilne@obsidian.co.za>
Subject: Re: OpenLDAP 2.1 (?) on RedHat Enterprise summary
From: "Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 12:23:29 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0405071114100.24547-100000@isis.obsidian.co.za>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0405061006050.10470-100000@quixote.unet.brandeis.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0405071114100.24547-100000@isis.obsidian.co.za>

> Granted, you will be serving orders of magnitude fewer searches than I
> am  catering for (our performance target is approx 10000 searches per
> minute  per server peak) , but we found RHEL3 an order of magnitude
> slower than  exactly the same hardware / configuration /software
> versions as RHEL2.1,  and RH could provide no assistance. So, RHEL3
> doesn't meet the performance  targets (and neither is it certified for
> clustering on EMC as 2.1 is).
>
> The performance problem was present on all the versionsofOpenLDAP we
> testedon RHEL3 (2.0.27 original RH-provided packags, our own 2.1.25 and
> 2.1.29 packages etc).

I'm quite interested in this performance issue, because what appears to us
is that RHEL3.0 performs quite better than 2.1 with threaded software in
general; can you detail on the kinds of tests you did?

p.

-- 
Pierangelo Masarati
mailto:pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it




    SysNet - via Dossi,8 27100 Pavia Tel: +390382573859 Fax: +390382476497

Follow-Ups:
- Re: OpenLDAP 2.1 (?) on RedHat Enterprise summary
  - From: Buchan Milne <bgmilne@obsidian.co.za>

References:
- OpenLDAP 2.1 (?) on RedHat Enterprise summary
  - From: Rich Graves <rcgraves@brandeis.edu>
- Re: OpenLDAP 2.1 (?) on RedHat Enterprise summary
  - From: Buchan Milne <bgmilne@obsidian.co.za>

Prev by Date: Re: ldapsearch don't work correctly with '*' in the filter
Next by Date: Re: OpenLDAP 2.1 (?) on RedHat Enterprise summary
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread