[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: Openldap 2.1.29/bdb/corrupted database

To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: RE: Openldap 2.1.29/bdb/corrupted database
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 13:39:16 -0700
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <B6DE0C3D9243E64782272C508B3089908B8DD2@svexmb01.merc-int.com>
References: <B6DE0C3D9243E64782272C508B3089908B8DD2@svexmb01.merc-int.com>

--On Thursday, May 06, 2004 1:11 PM -0700 Tim Walker <twalker@merc-int.com> wrote:


This is suggesting that cache size affects not only performance, but,
database integrity?

Correct. Otherwise you thrash your database. It was especially problematic in the 4.1.x BDB series.

See

<http://www.stanford.edu/services/directory/openldap/configuration/bdb-config.html>

--Quanah

--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITSS/TSS/Computing Systems
ITSS/TSS/Infrastructure Operations
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html

References:
- RE: Openldap 2.1.29/bdb/corrupted database
  - From: Tim Walker <twalker@merc-int.com>

Prev by Date: No Such Object Error: I can't solve
Next by Date: RE: Openldap 2.1.29/bdb/corrupted database
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread