[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: your mail

To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Subject: Re: your mail
From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 23:27:53 +0200
Cc: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>, openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org, debian-openldap@snowman.net
In-reply-to: <20040407204507.GJ7060@ns.snowman.net>
References: <09CA52A4-88CD-11D8-A60C-000393D5432E@mcclimans.net> <20040407195818.GF7060@ns.snowman.net> <680210851.1081345391@cadabra.stanford.edu> <20040407204507.GJ7060@ns.snowman.net>

Stephen Frost writes:
>> Wasn't 2.1.26 a fairly broken release?
> 
> I'm tempted to ask what release *isn't* broken. :) 

Stick to "stable" releases, then.  I don't think 2.1.26 was ever
"stable".

Though I'm a bit worried that 2.1.29 was declared "stable" so quickly
after it was released.

-- 
Hallvard

References:
- Re: your mail
  - From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
- Re: your mail
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
- Re: your mail
  - From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>

Prev by Date: Re: your mail
Next by Date: Re: slapd future questions
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread