[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: 2.2->2.1 replication via slurpd

To: "jehan.procaccia" <jehan.procaccia@int-evry.fr>
Subject: Re: 2.2->2.1 replication via slurpd
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 07:42:45 -0800
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <403F0C14.6060901@int-evry.fr>
References: <14286613.1077794126@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu> <403F0C14.6060901@int-evry.fr>

--On Friday, February 27, 2004 10:21 AM +0100 "jehan.procaccia" <jehan.procaccia@int-evry.fr> wrote:

have you tested the other way; master 2.1 -> slave 2.2 ? indeed if I
upgrade, I would prefer to upgrade slaves before !


Hi Jehan,

No, I've not tested that direction of replication, and it is unlikely I'll have the time to do so in the near future.

--Quanah


--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITSS/TSS/Computing Systems
ITSS/TSS/Infrastructure Operations
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html

References:
- 2.2->2.1 replication via slurpd
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
- Re: 2.2->2.1 replication via slurpd
  - From: "jehan.procaccia" <jehan.procaccia@int-evry.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: multi-attribute authentication
Next by Date: Re: Questions about SSL/TLS - yes, I read openldap.org
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread