Re: Library version naming confusion

[Jens Vagelpohl <jens@zope.com>]

> > influence this naming behavior, and do it "the right way"?
>
> The right way in my opinion is to let rpm include these dependencies, 
> and
> not just add "Requires: /usr/lib/libldap.so.2.0.125" or something like 
> that
> in the spec file.

It's actually the other way around. The RPM is not unusable because of 
dependencies it has itself, it's unusable because of the dependencies 
of every other RPM on the system, those all want "libldap.so.2".

jens

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature