[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: BDB-4.2.52 bug (Was Initial 2.2.4 exploration results)

To: David Parker <david.parker@rocketsoftware.com>, openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: RE: BDB-4.2.52 bug (Was Initial 2.2.4 exploration results)
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:28:16 -0800
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <9BFCEB1E1A274A49A866B6E9290752D601B5BF0A@xmail.rocketsoftware.com>
References: <9BFCEB1E1A274A49A866B6E9290752D601B5BF0A@xmail.rocketsoftware.c om>

--On Thursday, January 15, 2004 11:39 AM -0500 David Parker <david.parker@rocketsoftware.com> wrote:

On that patch, I assume that the lines marked with a "+" should be added,
and the lines marked with a "-" should be deleted?

Thanks.


Correct.

--Quanah

--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITSS/TSS/Computing Systems
ITSS/TSS/Infrastructure Operations
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html

References:
- RE: BDB-4.2.52 bug (Was Initial 2.2.4 exploration results)
  - From: "David Parker" <david.parker@rocketsoftware.com>

Prev by Date: Problem adding ldif.
Next by Date: where is structuralObjectClass operational attribute generated ?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread