[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: AW: bdb bad performance again (really need help)

To: OpenLDAP Software List <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: AW: bdb bad performance again (really need help)
From: Ace Suares <ace@suares.nl>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:55:21 -0400
Content-description: clearsigned data
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <DC7AAC9FAF16D711B8A7000629A81695676DC7@C010893.winterthur.ch>
Organization: Ace Suares' Internet Consultancy
References: <DC7AAC9FAF16D711B8A7000629A81695676DC7@C010893.winterthur.ch>
User-agent: KMail/1.5.1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Hi all,

if there is so many trouble with bdb, why not use ldbm ? 

I am wondering why f.i. Tony is so positive about bdb, while I see many posts 
with problems, something about cache corruption, something about needing a 
very large cache, and so on. What's the story ?

_Ace

website: http://www.suares.nl * http://www.qwikzite.nl
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/r7Tqy7boE8xtIjURAi4nAKCSlO4FHrD6pcblGc/FrCTziK6sRgCgiNMZ
Mc2JhuWXYiXw50l1ZhcQz7A=
=bISs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: AW: bdb bad performance again (really need help)
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>

References:
- AW: bdb bad performance again (really need help)
  - From: Tarassov Vadim <Vadim.Tarassov@winterthur.ch>

Prev by Date: Re: Support for swedish characters
Next by Date: Re: slapadd filching memory
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread