[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: Has anyone found a workaround? SASL/LDAP

To: "Steven J. Sobol" <sjsobol@JustThe.net>, openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: RE: Has anyone found a workaround? SASL/LDAP
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 12:33:12 -0700
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310041346580.7956-100000@amethyst.nstc.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310041346580.7956-100000@amethyst.nstc.com>

--On Saturday, October 04, 2003 1:50 PM -0400 "Steven J. Sobol" <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote:

Should I upgrade to 2.1 before putting any users
onto the server?

I'd say yes, given that 2.0 is no longer supported. OpenLDAP 2.1 requires SASL 2.1.x as well.

--Quanah

--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITSS/TSS/Computing Systems
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html

References:
- RE: Has anyone found a workaround? SASL/LDAP
  - From: "Steven J. Sobol" <sjsobol@JustThe.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Alternative to OpenLDAP
Next by Date: Re: Alternative to OpenLDAP
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread