[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: result 32: no such object

To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: result 32: no such object
From: Tony Earnshaw <tonni@billy.demon.nl>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 23:58:51 +0200
In-reply-to: <7A13F645CE428E44B77F7C20CEF9B3BB1CA31B@server1.domain.avtechpulse.com>
References: <7A13F645CE428E44B77F7C20CEF9B3BB1CA31B@server1.domain.avtechpulse.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:

That is an inconsistency, but it doesn't matter. The root DN is specified in the slapd.conf file, and can basically be anything.

Unfortunately, that's not how it works. Think of a DN as a chain, in which each link has to be present and the coherence previously defined.

However, for good measure I've changed the root DN to use "people" rather than "users". It doesn't change any of my problems.


That is not "the root DN".

Chain: either

ou=users,dc=avtechpulse,dc=com

*OR*

ou=people,dc=avtechpulse,dc=com

can be added to by tacking on a new rDN (relative domain name) at the front (assuming correct object classes and attributes). But you can't break the chain and just go adding any old link halfway through the chain.

It works for me and thousands of others ;)

--Tonni

--
Tony Earnshaw

Millom kaksar eg litet kann trivast, millom jamningar helst er eg nøgd

http://www.billy.demon.nl
Mail: billy@billy.demon.nl

References:
- RE: result 32: no such object
  - From: "Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak" <mjc@avtechpulse.com>

Prev by Date: Re: searching over multiple DNs
Next by Date: Re: Alternative to OpenLDAP
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread