Re: Openldap vs. IBM Directory Server

[Lee <lee_hoffman@brown.edu>]

> Other than that, You immediatly recognize the UMICH implementation 
> behind
> it, as it still is based heavily on that.
>
> Besides that, it is not a real ldapserver, but an ldap frontend to the 
> DB2
> database (which you have to buy!) so the free of IBM is different to 
> the
> free of IBM.
I was under the impression it came with a free DB2 license for use only 
with the Directory Server. Are you positive you still have to buy a 
license?

Thanks,
Lee

> Just my opinion,
>
> Regards, Dolf
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lee [mailto:lee_hoffman@brown.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 21:10
> To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
> Subject: Openldap vs. IBM Directory Server
>
>
> Hey All,
> We are evaluating a switch to IBM Directory Server from our current
> openldap cluster due to openldap's lack of (or should i say buggy)
> multimaster support.
>
> I wanted to get an impression from users of this list that have
> experience with both servers, and what if any advantages OpenLdap has
> over IBM's Directory Server (which is also free).
>
> Thanks,
> Lee