[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: CAN LOGIN WORK WITHOUT PAM
- To: "Nitin k." <nitin_kumar82@rediffmail.com>
- Subject: Re: CAN LOGIN WORK WITHOUT PAM
- From: Frank Swasey <Frank.Swasey@uvm.edu>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 07:17:07 -0400 (EDT)
- Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org, cecile.leyman@gfi.be, hyc@highlandsun.com, cmitrana@xnet.ro, quanah@stanford.edu, luke@madstop.com, syelich@commerzbank-usa.com, tthomas@chubb.com, walter+openldap@efrei.fr, jeremy@gaddis.org, xoror@infuse.org, h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no, tonni@billy.demon.nl, pll+ldap@lanminds.comge.net, ltierney@mykungfuisthebest.net, jmadden@ivytech.edu, nstreeter@message.nmc.edu
- In-reply-to: <20030422110525.13356.qmail@webmail15.rediffmail.com>
- References: <20030422110525.13356.qmail@webmail15.rediffmail.com>
Today at 11:05am, Nitin k. wrote:
> My question is what's the difference in getent and login as far as
> LDAP is concerned, if any AND Is PAM support imperative for the
> Login prog. to work with LDAP ?
I'm not positive, but I'll hazard a guess that the difference is the
getent is using an anonymous bind and the login isn't (nor can it
really).
--
Frank Swasey | http://www.uvm.edu/~fcs
Systems Programmer | Always remember: You are UNIQUE,
University of Vermont | just like everyone else.
=== God Bless Us All ===