[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: how to determine need to upgrade
Tony,
Epkg is totally unrelated to rpms... What we do is the following,
install things in /usr/local/encap/ for systemwide installs (We mount
/usr/local from our file server to our clients); and we do local installs
into /opt/local/encap for things that should run without relying on NFS,
such as openldap, samba, openssl, etc.....
A quick ls on one of my encap trees looks like:
% ls /opt/local/encap/
db-4.1.25 heimdal-0.5.1 openssl-0.9.6i sudo-1.6.6
db_libsonly-4.1.25 localstuff-1.0 sasl-2.1.12 zlib-1.1.4
epkg-2.2.6 openssl-0.9.6e sendmail-8.12.8
epkg.log openssl-0.9.6g sendmail-8.12.9
So as you can see I have 2 versions of sendmail, 3 of openssl, etc. That
is on one of my client machines, it would be sort of boring to copy one
from my filserver since I have even several subversion of things like
netscape 4,6 and 7 installed at the same time on the same system. The
epkg software simply makes links from ~/package-version/{bin, lib,
include, etc} into /opt/local or /usr/local so after you run epkg -i
everything gets symbolically linked to the bin, lib, include, etc
directories under /usr/local or /opt/local.... Cool huh?.... Well their
website explains a lot better than I do.
I even have epkged versions of gcc.... :P
BTW, we use epkg on Linux, Solaris, Mac OS X (with a small problem while
running make install, but fixable). And you can compile it for your
flavor of Unix....
Diego.
On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> fre, 11.04.2003 kl. 14.07 skrev Diego Julian Remolina:
>
> > Also, I know there is a lot of people that says "If it works, Why Upgrade"
> > but I rather stay with the latest and greatest because if you let time
> > pass by at the end it may be more difficult to make a major version
> > change on the long run, than to update often and make sure small changes
> > on the code do not break your apps.....
>
> Yea Brother! That's my philosophy too; I'm always pleased as punch when
> the new Openldap, BDB, whatever, actually works. Thanks for the epkg
> info btw, I've marked the posting as important.
>
> Just one question mark in my mind: "How does that fit into the rpm
> freaks' strategy?" I didn't visit the epkg web site yet, perhaps the FAQ
> gives the answer.
>
> Tony
>
> --
>
> Tony Earnshaw
>
> e-post: tonni@billy.demon.nl
> www: http://www.billy.demon.nl
>